tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837159629100463303.post6945487641866859604..comments2023-06-18T01:25:08.748-07:00Comments on Information Transfer Economics: Better than TIPSJason Smithhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/12680061127040420047noreply@blogger.comBlogger4125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837159629100463303.post-14596030666412623902014-07-18T13:35:25.639-07:002014-07-18T13:35:25.639-07:00I should have said:
"that is to say dP/dM0 i...I should have said:<br /><br />"that is to say dP/dM0 is really small"<br /><br />... leaving out the when.Jason Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12680061127040420047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837159629100463303.post-24409204349443322542014-07-18T13:32:11.171-07:002014-07-18T13:32:11.171-07:00I think situation #3 is likely. In Japan, they act...I think situation #3 is likely. In Japan, they actually gave up and set their inflation target at 1% for awhile. Only economists worry about low inflation, so there isn't going to be a big public outcry. <br /><br />As you get towards kappa ~ 1, the inflation you see is almost entirely due to NGDP growth, not base growth. The P(M0) curve is actually really flat past the point where dP/dM0 = 0, that is to say when dP/dM0 is really small. It looks like a bell curve, but in log space. In linear space, the front edge of the bell is really steep, but the back edge is really flat.<br /><br />That means rapid deflation won't happen (#1) -- it's just gradual.<br /><br />Regarding #2, I've been considering the idea that when economies reach dP/dM0 = 0, economic shocks suddenly have no monetary policy to buffer them. They just hurt the economy more and more until the economy collapses or something intervenes.<br /><br />The US went over the dP/dM0 = 0 line, and what resulted was the Great Depression and WWII.<br /><br /><a href="http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-liquidity-trap-and-information.html" rel="nofollow">http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2013/08/the-liquidity-trap-and-information.html</a><br /><br />Also, the dP/dM0 isn't always at kappa = 1; it is actually a curve with different values of kappa and sigma (in the link above).<br /><br />Jason Smithhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/12680061127040420047noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837159629100463303.post-57521825620298617762014-07-17T21:55:30.856-07:002014-07-17T21:55:30.856-07:00Jason O/T, I'm always confused about how to th...Jason O/T, I'm always confused about how to think about the kappa=1 scenario. <br /><br />Trying to imagine the theoretical sequence of events that get's an economy there breaks down at kappa = 1 for me. I can perhaps think about it in terms of a discrete time system, with noise or quantization errors, and assuming the implicit market based targeting CB realizes the difference between kappa < 1 and kappa > 1 (i.e. that when kappa > 1, they need to sell securities to raise P, since dP/dM0 < 0). Is that implicit in your endogenous solution? That the CB realizes the sign of dP/dM0? If that's the case then I see a normal inflation targeting CB moving, say from kappa < 1 up closer to 1, and all the while the size of their OMPs need to get bigger and bigger to keep on target. Because of the discretization in time and noise, they may cross over to kappa > 1 and then need to implement large OMSs... but they'll tend to converge to kappa=1, won't they? All the while the size of their OMPs and OMSs get large and stay large (or continue to get larger) as they converge to a narrow locus of points on either side of kappa = 1.<br /><br />It's not clear to me.<br /><br />I guess in practice we don't tend to see the CB converge to a place where it's BS is undergoing wild fluctuations, up and down, in size. We tend to see it get big and stay big (and or growing). Why is that? Is it because:<br /><br />1. CB's don't realize when dP/dM0 < 0? But if that were the case it seems like they could very well start a process of rapid deflation (as P shrinks, they increase M0 more, causing P to shrink further). That doesn't happen, right?<br /><br />2. Economies don't really cross the kappa=1 boundary, or if they do, then NGDP changes tend to automatically throw them back before the CB has a chance to cause accelerating deflation (assuming again that the CB doesn't realize that dP/dM0 could ever be < 0).<br /><br />3. As economies approach kappa = 1, CB's tend to give up on their original IT > 0, and start to settle for smaller and smaller ITs, perhaps even tolerating moderate inflation rates < 0 at times (i.e. there's s a de facto change in the target)Tom Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17654184190478330946noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6837159629100463303.post-53229008823709972332014-07-17T19:32:04.958-07:002014-07-17T19:32:04.958-07:00Nice... and fast turn around too!Nice... and fast turn around too!Tom Brownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17654184190478330946noreply@blogger.com