Friday, May 30, 2014

"Out of sample" predictions with the information transfer model

I understand some of the issues (see here and here) that come up when you try to test a model by fitting it to one subset of the available data and using it to predict values in another subset (that's what I mean by the quotation marks around "out of sample"). However, I thought it might be illuminating to see how much of the data from the period 1960-2014 is needed to accurately model the price level and inflation rate or "predict" generic trends. To that end, I fit the price level model to the data from the periods 1960-1970 (red), 1960-1975, 1960-1980, ... 1960-2005, and 1960-2010 (violet), following a rainbow color scheme (the data is the gray dotted line). In the graph below, I only show the "predicted" values extrapolated from the fits, which start at the vertical lines:


Update 5/30/2014: here are the model equations and parameters.

We can see fairly rapid convergence to the price level after about 25 years of training data (1960-1985), which is shown more clearly in this plot of the fit parameter values:


The interesting piece is that the trend towards a less-steep price level as the monetary base increases (a falling inflation rate, i.e. the effect seen in this graph) is already visible even in the fit to 1960-1970 (red) extrapolated to 1960-2014 -- that is, using the information transfer model, you could have seen the current "lowflation" environment in the US coming in the 1970s (amazingly, when inflation was at its peak).

This finding is more visibly dramatic if you look at the (year-over-year) inflation rate:


The red line is predicting low inflation in the 2000s just from 10 years of data in the 1960s (given the empirical path of the monetary base and NGDP). In fact, the issue that throws off the price level fits from that time and isn't predicted by the extrapolation are the two big spikes in inflation in the 1970s. We saw these before in this post on the 1970s -- attributed (at least in narrative form) to the oil shocks of the time, but could also be related to the "Fisher effect" and expected inflation.

Let me caveat the use of the word "prediction" here. The model uses as input empirical values of the currency component of the monetary base ('M0') and NGDP in the extrapolations. However, the model parameters are fixed in that original 10 years of data. In order to get the current inflation rate, you'd stick the current values of NGDP and M0 into the formula you would have had around since the 1970s (if it had existed at the time). That is, the model predicts a fixed relationship between P, M0 and NGDP and given any two values, fixes (i.e. "predicts") the third.

2 comments:

  1. This is extremely impressive, but is it useful? I find it very hard to predict the values of NGDP, M0 and P 40 years from now. You're telling me that it's enough to predict NGDP and M0 (or any other pair of them). But this is still very hard. Even with the ITM, it doesn't seem like a person living in 1970 could have predicted the current trends in NGDP, M0 and P. Do you disagree?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi M,

      I actually wrote this post before I discovered that the path of NGDP-M0 is itself fairly stable for reasons that seem related to the reason why inflation predictably falls in the model above:

      http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2014/06/the-macroeconomic-partition-function.html

      That reduces the problem to just predicting NGDP or M0, which is still admittedly hard.

      I've used this to try and predict future NGDP in the US and China, for example:

      http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2015/01/ngdp-predictions-and-new-normal.html

      http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2014/10/can-china-successfully-slow-down.html

      The thing is that a person living in 1970 would not have had a strong reason to include the changing information transfer index (unless they had some really long run data). It is unlikely they would have come up with the model in the first place.

      As to the overall usefulness, I am not sure. Predicting the value of inflation within a 100 basis points 20 years from now even with a good estimate of future M0 won't have a huge impact on people's lives. People would care about prediciting recessions. Central banks seem interested in the shorter term, but overall I'd say it is an academic problem -- like predicting the orbits of planets. At least that is my interest in it.

      Delete

Comments are welcome. Please see the Moderation and comment policy.

Also, try to avoid the use of dollar signs as they interfere with my setup of mathjax. I left it set up that way because I think this is funny for an economics blog. You can use € or £ instead.