Thursday, May 5, 2016

Remember everyone who said inflation had arrived in Japan?


I was updating my inflation (price level) predictions for Japan (above), but I thought I'd say a bit more.

Noah Smith said that Japan was an economics lab where theories go to die, but I think it's just the place where economics PhDs end up being wrong. For some reason it seemed everyone thought that the monetary component of "Abenomics" would raise inflation despite quantitative easing doing no such thing in the past couple decades in Japan. And then along came a VAT increase of about 3%, and the CPI jumped about 2-3%. Noah Smith, Mark Sadowski and Scott Sumner all said the promised inflation had arrived. The second one was the GDP deflator, but as the 1997 VAT hike is in there, I seriously doubt that when GDP deflator data becomes available it's going to vindicate Sumner and Sadowski.

To his credit, Scott Sumner recognized that it was going to happen before it did, but I'm guessing in his zeal to say market monetarism is right he forgot.

Well, now it has become so super-obvious that this was a temporary jump due to the VAT increase. For example, here's Reuter's from earlier this year:


It's even more obvious in this year-over-year inflation graph from the WSJ:


A spike in YoY inflation that lasts exactly a year? Come on!

In the price level I used in the predictions, I corrected for the spikes in 1997 and 2014. Overall, it's doing well. Better than the economics PhDs, at least.

2 comments:

  1. I'd say you definitely have made a strong case that expansion of M1 != inflation. Would love to see some helicopter money, though, now that would be interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm torn -- desire for vindication of the Phillips curve makes me want more inflation, but desire for Market Monetarism to die makes me want inflation to never materialize. Problem is that Phillips curve of some form is a logical requirement money non-neutrality; firms cut prices if profits low, raise them if profits can be increased at higher prices, also any instance of non-instant tatonnement implies PC.

    ReplyDelete