Saturday, March 25, 2017

The mystery of Japan's inflation

Noah Smith has said that Japan is where macroeconomic theories go to die (well, except this one), and when I initially looked at Japan's price level it with the dynamic equilibrium model (more here) it looked grim. However, as the Dude says, my thinking about this case had become very uptight. While Japan would not be a good example of the dynamic equilibrium framework on its own, given the framework works for other inflation data (e.g. here or here) we can be a bit more assured that the giant ongoing shock required to fit the price level data isn't spurious. It still could be spurious, but at least it's not a "surely you're joking" ad hoc hypothesis.

Anyway, here are the model results using the same codes available here:



Note that I removed the effects of the VAT increases from the data. The shocks are centered at 1974.6 (positive) and 2006.5 (negative). What's also interesting is that the width (similar to the standard deviation of a normal distribution) of the latter shock is 108 months (9 years) which means it won't be over for many years to come. Instead of "Abenomics", the recent rising/stabilizing inflation is the ending of the giant "lost decade" shock.

Of course, this picture also makes a bold claim that the equilibrium rate of inflation is 4.3% per year (± 0.4 percentage points at 2σ). That seems like something that would be good to test, so here are the relevant forecasts through 2020 (and will be added to the forecast page):


PS For another macro mystery set in Japan, here's my old post on Japan's monetary base.

2 comments:

  1. Just to be clear- are you predicting that inflation in Japan will be rising in coming years to something like 4%?!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Unfortunately because the earliest data I have is from the 1970s that result might be biased high, but yes that's the equilibrium value. It wouldn't be reached for nigh onto 30 years because of the shear width of the negative shock.

      I'd expect a revision downward if some data from before 1970 was available but you forecast with the data you have, not the data you want.

      Delete