I saw JP Koning's post on bitcoin today, and the graph of the dollar/bitcoin exchange rate shows the tell-tale signs of a dynamic equilibrium.
After cobbling together a time series from this source of data, the model shows that there are nine major shocks. Eight centroids are (one at the beginning didn't have enough data): 2012.5, 2013.2, 2013.8, 2014.4, 2015.8, 2016.4, 2017.0, and 2017.4 (the current massive rise). Graphically, this is what it looks like (in linear and log scale):
I wouldn't put too much stock in the exact timing of the collapse of the latest shock; it's fairly uncertain (as we can see from the graphs of the unemployment rate forecast). But it it's correct, then I'll totally take credit. Just kidding.
The interesting thing is that the dynamic equilibrium itself is a fractional decrease of −2.6/y (i.e. bitcoin loses more than half its value over the course of a year). This makes it similar to gold, but on a much faster time scale (gold is −0.027/y). That is to say, you can think of bitcoin as a time lapse picture of gold; what happens to gold over 100 years happens to bitcoin in a year.
Another consequence of that is that bitcoin is just as stable for a transaction that takes place over a day (trading in the 21st century) as gold is for a transaction that takes place over 100 days (trading in the 18th century).
I found that absolutely fascinating.
What does this mean for the future? Well, as long as positive shocks keep coming that are big enough and/or frequent enough, the value of bitcoin never has to go to zero. Estimating using a Poisson process with the current shocks, we have a time scale of 1.4 years (inter-shock period) which may well be sufficient given the size of the shocks already visible in the data (I want to analyze this further).
Any idea what the Bitcoin shocks are?ReplyDelete
It would be pure speculation on my part. However, I think there are a bunch of overlaps with news about various firms accepting bitcoin:Delete
Note that there is little news in the 2015 section and there is an absence of shocks in the data. But that is speculative and circumstantial.
Bitcoin seems to be the opposite of e.g. employment in the sense that bitcoin has mostly positive shocks while employment is mostly negative shocks.
I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well..ReplyDelete
usi tech bitcoin