Tuesday, November 11, 2014

In which I irritate Nick Rowe (again)



I am currently on travel for work (again) so light updates this week, but I thought I could irritate Nick Rowe some more. He has a new post up where he shows how police could regulate the speed of drivers without actually pulling anyone over:

http://worthwhile.typepad.com/worthwhile_canadian_initi/2014/11/the-collective-speed-limit-game.html

I took on two other analogies before here:

http://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2014/10/the-trouble-with-nick-rowes.html

... and my critique is similar this time.

The speed limit analogy would make sense if we all had NGDP/inflation meters/pedals. However, since many of the influences that go into NGDP or inflation are beyond our control, it's hard for individuals to target them.

A restaurant owner can't have her patrons enjoy the food 1% more while paying 3% more (to hit 2% inflation, including quality adjustments). She can't help it if suddenly her chief ingredients become cheaper and competition forces her to reduce prices ... This has been happening in the computer industry for awhile now, with actual deflation in the tech sector price level.

That's the gist of the linked post; here's some new stuff.

1.

A tiny tweak to the behavior model turns the speed limit equilibrium into a boom-bust cycle. If the police don't pull anyone over (and no one is being seen being pulled over), people will start to speed more often and the police will start having to pull people over (concrete steps). Eventually enough people are pulled over (or witness such events) that leads back to the zero-enforcement scenario. Which leads to speeding and the cycle begins anew.

In the economic version, you'd see central bank targets start to lose their effectiveness, followed by concrete steps.

2.

You can get the same speed limit equilibrium without expectations. In an ideal gas the velocity of particles follows a maxwell Boltzmann distribution with average speed ~ kT. Nothing actually acts on the molecules to achieve this at the micro level -- the effect of the cops in this case is an emergent entropic force that does not exist for individuals.

3.

If Inflation and demand don't actually exist at the micro level, then the speed limit analogy doesn't make any sense at all. We can't measure our individual speed much like an individual molecule doesn't have a temperature. There is nothing to expect! You can't get tickets for going "undefined" ...

[This is not a very good post. BTW I'm writing it in a hotel room down the street from the St Louis Fed with one finger on my iPad, hence the picture above.]

2 comments:

  1. "If Inflation and demand don't actually exist at the micro level, then the speed limit analogy doesn't make any sense at all. We can't measure our individual speed much like an individual molecule doesn't have a temperature."

    Individual firms decide how much to raise (or lower) their prices. Each firm's choice will depend on many things, including how much other firms raise their prices. The economy-wide inflation rate is just the (weighted) average of all those individual firms' inflation rates.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Hi Nick,

      I'm not *trying* to irritate you, it's just that my muddled thinking probably does :)

      This was one of the more confused thoughts. P = weighted average of prices in the information transfer model, too. There were supposed to be two thoughts here:

      1. Inflation doesn't exist *without concrete steps*

      Individual firms can set prices, but they can't obey the inflation cop without actual money exchanged for goods since setting a price might depress demand (or increase it) or just be inflation. You can't tell without knowing the quantity supplied.

      2. *Prices* don't exist at the individual transaction (micro) level.

      E.g. My company paid about 800 bucks for my flight to St Louis, but people sitting next to me paid different prices -- there's no unique price from which to judge inflation at the transaction level, hence no way to expect a certain value.

      When you aggregate all transactions for a particular good, you get an equilibrium price at the intersection of S&D curves. But that also doesn't happen without concrete steps: actual money changing hands.

      (Price of plane seats doesn't exist without a market for plane seats where seats and money change hands.)

      However!

      This doesn't mean expectations can't move a market price in the short run. Company A announces it will buy company B for 40 € a share. The price on the exchange will immediately jump to 39.89 € per share. However, if company A never takes any concrete steps, then the price will drift away from 40 €.

      The information transfer model also says that some prices can't eventually be reached by the concrete steps, so e.g. chronic inflation undershooting can occur.

      Delete

Comments are welcome. Please see the Moderation and comment policy.

Also, try to avoid the use of dollar signs as they interfere with my setup of mathjax. I left it set up that way because I think this is funny for an economics blog. You can use € or £ instead.