Vincent Cate commented on my earlier post asking if I had looked into Austrian business cycle theory. My earlier post had been about whether you could predict recessions by looking at whether the economy had gone off the information transfer model (ITM) "theoretical NGDP path" shown in gray (data is shown in blue and recessions marked in red):

Austrian business cycle theory makes the prediction that printing money and/or low interest rates lead to malinvestment that turns into credit crunch (recession) when it becomes unsustainable. Since the theoretical NGDP path (gray, above) can be plugged into the interest rate formula to show how interest rates "should" behave, I thought that we could test the Austrian model against the ITM. The result was inconclusive for the long term interest rates (10-year Treasury):

The data is shown in green with recessions highlighted in red. The theoretical interest rate path is shown in gray (based on the theoretical NGDP path in the first graph). If we turn to the short term interest rate (effective Fed funds or 3-month Treasury rate), we do get a pretty good indicator a recession is coming:

Almost every time the actual effective Fed funds rate (green) is above the theoretical curve (gray) a recession follows. This is actually a better indicator than NGDP in the earlier post.

However, the ITM result is in direct conflict with the Austrian picture where low interest rates cause malinvestment and recessions. In the ITM, unusually

**interest rates (relative to the theoretical curve) are precursors to recessions. This does conform with the earlier result that says NGDP above its theoretical level is a precursor -- interest rates***high**r*are given by:*log r ~ log NGDP/MB*

so that if

*log NGDP*is above where it "should" be, then*log r*will be above where it "should" be.
Answering the question in the title: yes, short run interest rates seem to be a good indicator. There are still some other questions here. Are rates high because the central bank is trying to cause a recession? Are rates low afterward because of the response from the Fed? To help answer these questions, here are the theoretical long and short run interest rates on their own:

Note that these two lines include fluctuations of the monetary base (and currency) -- only a small fraction of the remaining fluctuations in the interest rate come from changes in NGDP. That means most of the fluctuations in the interest rate (the ones that become indicators of a recession two graphs above) are

*deviations from the model*. Therefore the market seems to be doing the indicating.
Markets desiring high interest rates could be a sign of many things (never reason from a price [change]), one of which is expected future NGDP growth (why put money in Treasuries when there are higher returns in the stock market or other investments -- a mechanism that lowers demand). That is interesting: it is an indication that over-optimism can lead to a recession (as I've discussed before). Another possibility is that high rates result from an excess supply of Treasuries (too much government deficit spending

*outside of a recession*leads to a recession). There are other possibilities; feel free to add your own in comments!
[I should be extra careful I got that right:

**mean a***high rates***for a Treasury bond. Low prices mean a demand deficit or excess supply.]***low price*
Right before the recession rates go up but the reason rates go up is they were too low before that. So low rates and then $140/brl oil get the fed to push rates up. In the 1920s the new Fed made a boom called "the roaring 20s" and then as people took out their gold the Fed tightened the money supply.

ReplyDeleteI took on the 1920s (and in fact 1798 to 2014) here:

Deletehttp://informationtransfereconomics.blogspot.com/2014/09/the-us-economy-1798-to-present.html