There was a brief period several days ago where markups were all the rage in the econ blogs due to a new paper on market power by Jan De Loecker and Jan Eeckhout. Dietrich Vollrath documents it in his opening paragraph here. He also discusses the paper at length and I recommend his post.

This post is mostly just a few notes about interpreting this in terms of information equilibrium. Vollrath illustrates the basic formula (in terms of a single input/output, just add indices as necessary):

Markup = \frac{Revenue}{MC \times Inputs}

$$

We can rewrite this in terms of an information equilibrium relationship where the marginal costs $MC$ are the abstract price in the "market for revenue" $R \rightleftarrows I$ with input $I$ with IT index $1/\mu$ (see here for definitions):

$$

\frac{\partial R}{\partial I} = \frac{1}{\mu} \; \frac{R}{I}

$$

Rearranging:

$$

\mu = \frac{R}{\frac{\partial R}{\partial I} \times I}

$$

So we can make the identification of $\mu$ with the markup. Now in the paper, they discover $\mu$ is changing. This is exactly what happens if we think of this equation as representing an ensemble average:

\langle \mu \rangle = \frac{\langle R \rangle}{\frac{\partial \langle R \rangle}{\partial I} \times I}

$$

In fact, $\mu$ changes exactly how we'd expect it to if this was coming from an ensemble:

The key thing to recognize is that the markup in the first graph is the inverse of the IT index graphed in the second graph: a rise in the markup is a fall in the IT index. The second graph is from this post on falling labor productivity growth (see also here). Interestingly, Vollrath and the paper also discuss a connection with falling productivity growth. (

**Update #1:**the graphs have different domains as well, but as the inputs are generally growing $\sim \exp r t$, then there is a log-linear relationship between the magnitude of inputs and time.**Update #2:**see update #3 below.).
The "market power" story people are telling in relation to this paper (and before) is in the information equilibrium re-telling the exact same story I've told before: there are a lot more ways to construct an economy with a particular growth rate out of many firms in low growth states and a few in high growth states than out of many firms in high growth states. The "maximum entropy" state should result in lower (ensemble average) productivity and (here) higher (ensemble average) markups. See here for a more detailed explanation in terms of partition functions.

...

Actually reran the computation to show an apples-to-apples comparison. First, there is the IT index versus inputs (as above):

Then there are the exponentially growing inputs:

Putting these together (and using IT index = 1/markup) with the markup data from the paper (red) as an overlay:

Also, this is what an example Monte Carlo throw for available state space for the ensemble of firms' markups looked like (q.v. here):

...

**Update #3:**Actually reran the computation to show an apples-to-apples comparison. First, there is the IT index versus inputs (as above):

Then there are the exponentially growing inputs:

Putting these together (and using IT index = 1/markup) with the markup data from the paper (red) as an overlay:

Also, this is what an example Monte Carlo throw for available state space for the ensemble of firms' markups looked like (q.v. here):

## No comments:

## Post a Comment

Comments are welcome. Please see the Moderation and comment policy.

Also, try to avoid the use of dollar signs as they interfere with my setup of mathjax. I left it set up that way because I think this is funny for an economics blog. You can use € or £ instead.

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.